2012 Logo   Website for Beginning Linux Users
Read in 134 countries.

  Main Menu
Linux Help
Favorite Links
Our Community

  Site Search
Search our exclusive articles:

  What's Hot

Installing & Configuring
Details on configuration and setting up a linux server.

For Server Administrators
Articles to help you get started with server administration.

MANY MORE Articles on Linux
Click here for our full listing.

JAK ATTACK podcast
A special prop to our friend in Canada Jon Watson for his decade long support of Linux and what we do here.

Thank you Jon, you are always on on hearts! Listen in on one of the best podcasts: Jak Attack       print

Trend Analysis Network -      

How Enculturation Processes Determine a Society's Future Trends

by Mark Rais


Why another think tank in an environment where too much information exists and too little of it matters?

The ultimate form of determinism is the enculturation devised model by which humans create their destiny by the sheer force of their cultural dominant traits. We can see this play out most overtly by that superficial yet profoundly dominant enculturation that takes place in the United States of America. In this national conscience we find the determinism stronger than most, so profoundly assimilated by the masses they are neither aware nor capable of changing the patterns that will establish their destiny.

Looking at the emphatic dominance of the enculturated ideals of personal freedom, self-will, and inherent self-righteousness, the people have determined already the reality they will create for themselves over the next 20 years.

We have only to extrapolate from this dominant enculturation the key facets to determine events and results for existing generations. The deterministic model we identify in the American culture allows us to verify who will win the presidential elections in November (which we already stated will not be decided until mid-December), what the economic climate will resemble, and the major upheavals we can expect not only for the long term but also in the very short term. Trends become the determined culmination of the most dominant enculturation.

To understand how we determine future events, and predict upcoming trends, please visit our page: Trend Analysis Network .com

How Enculturation Processes Determine a Society's Future Trends

Today, neither parents nor government are the primary influencers of childrens behaviours. As much as parents and even those in government believe that they have the ability to effectively influence childrens motivations and actions, there is a far more effective influencing agent at work in the hearts and minds of our children. 

The bombarding of thousands of messages across media has instructed children in ethics, moral principals, and priorities often in conflict with those of parents and government.

A Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation report on the exposure to media messages sheds light on the true intensity.  The report titled Generation M: Media in the Lives of 8-18 Year-olds, notes that a typical 8 to 18-year-old is exposed to 8.5 hours of recreational media content daily.

It is very difficult for either parents, or government role models and authority figures (teachers, counsellors, law enforcement officers) to effectively convey information that is contrary to such a thorough barrage of communication.

Todays children are being programmed through the consistency and proliferation of advertising messages -- not in the dozens, or hundreds, but by the tens of thousands per year.

Children have always had a tendency to reject authoritative voices.  They have always had a tendency to desire immediate physical gratification, whether it is exercised in sex, alcohol, food, etc.  However, never before have parents and government had their voice so thoroughly dampened by countless messages and ethics of someone else.

It is a very real war for the hearts and minds of our children, a war fought between those who care about how well children grow up to be adults and those who care how well they grow up to be consumers.

What happens to a society when inner wants are profoundly emphasised and constantly encouraged is that there is an unforeseen and significant change in behaviour.


Children may be instructed subtly to accept a desire or motivation over what is a parental voice, or even the law.  When this is combined with the pressures and bullying that often accompanies children among peer groups, the force to act on negative desires is extraordinary.

Not all advertising pushes the boundary so far as to provide teaching on a divisive form of ethics or morality.  However, there are substantive numbers of messages promoting behaviours directly in conflict with the intent of parents and those in government.

Parents and government are potentially seen as fundamental inhibitors to a childs desires.

As a result, parents and government become the key barriers to selling products to children because they have the power to:

1. Restrict the level of influence a third party can have over desires and actions

2. Impede the successful conversion of marketing dollars to product sales

For this reason, many messages are subtly encouraging children to challenge voices that do not give them the coached desires.  The result is an increase in anti-social behaviour, because social norms and authority voices are now considered negative by such children. 


In a summary of how strong the influence of advertisements are on children, a New American Dream article notes it is often the case for children nagging parents that No Means NoĻUntil It Finally Means Yes."

In a recent NZ Herald article on violence and video games, it was reported that: Ministry of Justice figuresĻ showed sharp increases in the number of young people aged 14 to 20 caught by police for violent behaviour in 2005 and 2006.  

Such anti-social behaviour is increasing in prevalence throughout New Zealand, in large cities and small communities alike. 

It is substantive enough that leaders such as Taupos Mayor Rick Cooper have begun new plans to respond to the growing anti-social behaviors.


In the United States alone, the advertising market now exceeds over $150 Billion per year.  It is estimated that approximately $12 Billion is spent for advertising explicitly targeting children.

Billions of dollars in advertising expenditures targeting children occurs because it is effective at influencing people.  However, few are willing to make the association between influencing children and the results of their behaviours. 

A growing pool of research now indicates that advertising is a significant influencing agent, especially among children.


In an article in The Nation, Steven Manning reports:

˜The sheer amount of advertising [children] are exposed to today is "staggering and emotionally harmful," says Susan Linn, a Harvard Medical School psychologist who studies media at the Judge Baker Children's Center in Boston.

Todays advertising is not simply creating direct links between consumer and product.  Instead, advertising has taken on a role as ethical instructor.  Advertising now poses as the role model, mentor and cultivator for children. 


There is minimal quantifiable evidence that a particular media message can invoke anti-social or dangerous behaviour in children.  However, the reason is because marketing is not effective when isolated in terms of a message, or an image, or one ad.

Effective persuasion occurs when multiple media are used to convey multiple levels of the same message in coordination. 

For this reason it is often impossible to prove that a particular media message was behind specific behaviour in a child. 

However, if you observe a child, who for example may have a predisposition to sadism, and then have that child observe violence in ads, play violent video games, listen to violent music, watch violent television shows, attend violent sport events, and view violence in movies, a unique formula appears. 


Total number of messages appealing to a desire in child +

childs susceptibility to that desire =

likelihood of acting on that desire

This is a key formula for advertising, or it would not be a billion dollar industry.  Notice that even if a child has negligible predisposition, they may still act on the desire when exposed to sufficient messages.  The point of emphasis is that exposure to the message is a key influencer.

What few people understand is the cost to society when children are exposed to so many, often unhealthy or anti-social messages.


Having advertisements and media messages as the primary influencing agents in the development of a childs desires can directly impact the costs associated with education, health care, law enforcement, justice, corrections etc.  

The American Psychological Association declared in a task force report that television advertisements targeting children leads to unhealthy habits and those children are unable to critically comprehend televised advertising messages. 

Another cost is the decline of childrens maturation into productive and responsible adults. 


This is not a new point. This has been conveyed for some time by leading psychologists and other medical professionals.  The American Association of Pediatrics recently took a direct stand against marketing to children.  In a policy statement the AAP notes that, "Research has shown that young children are cognitively and psychologically defenseless against advertising."


The Pediatric doctors have been expressing their concern for years, including a statementfrom their Committee on Public Education, stating that, In the scientific literature on media violence, the connection of media violence to real-life aggressive behavior and violence has been substantiated.


Today we face an increasingly violent, sexual, anti-social messaging that is targeting children.  Of course, children have always had a tendency to want to go around authority, to play games and place fun over responsibility.  However, never before have the parents and the government had their voice so thoroughly dampened by the messages and ethics of someone else.

The war we face to help our children develop into socially responsible adults is not between parents and government. 

It is a very real war for the hearts and minds of our children, a war fought between those who care about how well children grow up to be adults and those who care how well they grow up to be consumers.

The most profoundly effective power both parents and government have today is the power to protect children from the bombardment of messages that are often neither beneficial nor benign.

The responsibility that government has is to invoke and enforce laws that ensure children are not the explicit target of media messages that promote anti-social behaviour.  Similarly, parents play an important role in helping to encourage and protect children from messages that are often not beneficial for their development.

Fundamentally, the real issue is whether either government or parents understand that their own voice is being replaced with the voice of another.

Mark Rais is the creator of the think tank Trend Analysis Network, writer for the technology and science industry and volunteer senior editor for an on-line magazine. He has published several books and written numerous articles on the topics of macro-economics, technology and society.


We have a complete list of all of our new and exclusive articles on this full article listing page.

© 2020 Mark Rais & All rights reserved internationally. Copyright notices provided. Updated 2020.

Who Are We?     -    Legal Information.     -    Privacy Policy.

Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds.
All other trademarks and registered trademarks on this entire web site are owned by their respective companies.
This site is not related to or affiliated with any other technology or other websites.

This site also retains the management and infrastructure used by the think tank Trend Analysis Network NZ that can be reached at Trend Analysis Network